Sentence examples for disclosed expenditures from inspiring English sources

Other top-spending Republican-oriented groups in House races include: American Action Network, a nonprofit advocacy group created this year by Republican operatives, which has reported spending about $10 million; the 60 Plus Association has disclosed expenditures of roughly $8 million; and American Future Fund, an Iowa-based nonprofit, has reported investing about $7 million in House races.

The disclosed expenditures of the DC lobbying industry are more than $3 billion per year, while just the presidential political campaigns spent more than $1.5 billion in 2016.

The Tampa Bay Times raised questions in April about the jet, noting the lack of disclosed expenditures violated Florida campaign finance laws.

The Senate measure would require corporations, unions and any other organization paying for election-cycle messages to disclose expenditures of $10,000 or more within 24 hours and identify donors writing checks of $10,000 or more.

Rather it would require corporations, unions and any other organized group paying for election-cycle messages to disclose expenditures of $10,000 or more within 24 hours of making them, and to identify donors who write checks of $10,000 or more.

Presidential inauguration committees would be required to disclose expenditures and be banned from spending money on anything not related to the actual inauguration.

Nonprofits disclose expenditures in broad categories such as "travel," "meals" and "meetings" without noting the purpose of the expense or who benefited.

"The expenditure transparency of local authorities far outstrips that of many NHS Trusts, some of whom refuse to disclose expenditure data at all," she said.

(Unions already must disclose expenditure and membership information to the Department of Labor).

The officials said they thought that Mr. Jackson was essentially an unregistered lobbyist who should have disclosed his expenditures on favors for lawmakers.

In its Citizens United decision, the Supreme Court, by an 8-1 majority, upheld the provisions of federal law that require outside spending groups to disclose their expenditures on electioneering communications, including the donors financing those expenditures.