Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "disastrous for" is grammatically correct and can be used in written English.
It is commonly used to describe something that will result in great harm or destruction. Here is an example: The decision to cut funding for education would be disastrous for the future of our youth.
Exact(59)
"It's disastrous for unity".
"It's disastrous for journalists.
It's disastrous for his political project.
The association proved disastrous for Chagnon.
The Afghan interlude was disastrous for Iran.
Politically, this has been disastrous for Labour.
This will be disastrous for energy security".
But it might be disastrous for India.
The holdings proved disastrous for the bank.
But it is disastrous for all readers.
That would be disastrous for the island.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com