Your English writing platform
Discover Ludwig
The phrase 'disaster of' is not a correct English phrase and cannot be used as such. It is possible to use variations such as 'disaster for' or 'disaster with', but it is not grammatically correct to use 'disaster of' on its own. Example: The sanctions imposed on the country were a disaster for its economy.
Exact(58)
Witness the disaster of Mali.
Disaster of a first 20".
Then came the disaster of 2005.
"He inherited a disaster of a situation".
Tells about the financial disaster of Golfun Productions.
So, not a disaster of a Summit.
There was the Dardanelles disaster of 1915.
It's impossible to "clean up" a disaster of this magnitude.
After the disaster of Iraq, the atmosphere shifted.
Think of it as a disaster of human making.
Oh, and the ongoing disaster of economic policy?
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com