Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(13)
This is very encouraging as it shows that the only significant impact of our decision to rely on ASM-V data rather than nominal L1b VFM data to produce our candidate model is in the form of disagreements limited to high northern latitudes, these disagreements being related to our modeling choice of only relying on Swarm data with an intrinsically limited spatiotemporal coverage.
This procedure was performed by both authors independently, with disagreements being resolved by discussion.
Final decisions were reached by consensus, with disagreements being resolved by discussion.
In the FDG data there was little direct conflict referred to, with only minor tensions or disagreements being voiced.
Study selection, data extraction, validation and quality assessment were performed by two reviewers with disagreements being settled by discussion.
Two reviewers (MEP and CGF) confirmed the eligibility of all the identified studies with disagreements being resolved by discussion.
Similar(47)
Disagreements are allowed.
Our disagreements are polite.
Some systematic disagreements are present.
These disagreements are theologically important.
These disagreements are "minority reports".
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com