Over the years, various modifications on the basic Poisson distribution have been proposed to compensate these disagreements [30].
In his introduction, Camosy, who is pro-life, outlined three goals: 1. Better map disagreements; 2. Find common ground across divides; 3. Have open hearts and open minds.
Although the use of multiple assessors may limit bias, minimise errors and improve reliability, it could give rise to disagreements [22].
13 Disagreements (n=1) were resolved by discussion.
Disagreements (n=2) were resolved by discussion and were both explained by human error.
The reactions to Dog allergen showed the highest rate of disagreements: 4%.
Of these 50 disagreements, 32 were because one coder used an X rather than a more specific body code.
In the disagreements, RVD2 did not call positions 1, 39, 54 and 84 while muTect did not call positions 41 75 and 77.
There was no crude difference in re-admission rates between discharges with and without disposition disagreements (33.3% vs 30.5%, respectively; OR=1.14, 95% CI 0.57 to 2.19; p=0.71).
2 disagreements (14%) occurred when a diffuse opacity was coded as "lines" by one examiner and as "patchy" by the other one.
