Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
This scale consists of 12 questions about general and specific environmental worries (e.g. noise exposure or general environmental pollution) and was assessed on a four-point Likert scale (fully agree, partly agree, partly disagree, fully disagree).
The same vignettes as before mentioned will be used in the attitude assessment, which will have to be answered within a five categories scale: "fully agree", "partly agree", "neither agree, nor disagree", "partly disagree", "fully disagree".
Similar(58)
The participating rheumatologists quantified their agreement with each recommendation on a 1 10 scale (fully disagree to fully agree), and the potential impact of each recommendation on their clinical practice on a multiple choice question (recommendation will change my practice/is in accordance with my practice/I don't want to apply this recommendation).
range from 1 "fully disagree" to 5 "fully agree".
Items are rated on a 4-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (fully disagree) to 4 (fully agree).
Items are rated on a four-point Likert type scale ranging from 1 (fully disagree) to 4 (fully agree).
Subscales for the ASES are pain, symptoms and physical functioning, the 19 statements can be scored on a 5 point-Likert scale (1 = fully disagree; 5 = fully agree).
Participants were asked to rate each of the 21 statements using a scale from 0 (fully disagree) to 10 (fully agree).
The questionnaire consisted of 13 items (statements about the benefit of the video-based supervision and the experienced feedback), rated individually on a scale from 1 to 6 (1 = fully disagree, 6 = fully agree).
Directly after the training the research assistants are asked about their opinions about their acquired skills in self-monitoring and their capability to train and instruct participants following protocol (5-point Likert scale; 1 = fully disagree, 5 = fully agree).
The students were asked to score their agreement to the statements 'content is well structured', 'content extent is appropriate' and 'content is relevant for medical purposes' on a scale ranging from 1 (fully disagree) to 5 (fully agree).
More suggestions(5)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com