directors for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "directors for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to individuals who hold a director position for a specific organization, project, or initiative. Example: "The directors for the new film project will be announced next week."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

But sanctions on directors for poor performance are minimal.

The New York Times

Did you look to any other directors for inspiration?

The New York Times

He wanted the big directors for his scripts.

The New York Times

Mr. Reed must also ask most directors for their resignations.

The New York Times

"Shatner eats directors for lunch, you are really hit hard by him," maintains Folds.

Independent

Mr. Oresman was a member of our Board of Directors for 33 years.

The New York Times

William Berns thanked the directors for sending in magazine and newspaper clippings about the Fair.

The New Yorker

Actors have been known to sleep with less powerful directors for advancement in show business.

The New York Times - Magazine

"Congress today basically acts as a board of directors for the F.A.A".

The New York Times

Mr. Fessenden has shared his filmmaking secrets with like-minded directors for decades.

The New York Times

The deadline for Coty to nominate directors for election passed in February of this year.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "directors for", ensure clarity regarding the entity or area for which the directors are responsible. For example, specify "directors for the marketing department" rather than just "directors".

Common error

Avoid using "directors for" when "directors of" is more appropriate. "Directors of" is generally used to indicate membership or leadership within a specific board or organization, whereas "directors for" typically specifies a particular purpose or project.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "directors for" typically functions as a noun phrase acting as an adjectival modifier. It specifies the purpose or area of responsibility associated with the directors. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, this usage is grammatically correct.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

20%

Formal & Business

15%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

10%

Wiki

10%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "directors for" is a common and grammatically correct construction used to specify the area or purpose of responsibility for a group of directors. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it's frequently found in news, media, scientific, and business contexts, with a generally neutral to professional register. While "directors of" indicates membership or leadership within an organization, "directors for" clarifies the specific project, initiative, or department for which they are responsible. When using this phrase, clearly define the entity for which the directors are accountable to avoid ambiguity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

board members for

Specifies "board members" as an alternative to "directors", indicating a board-level role.

managers of

Replaces "directors" with "managers", emphasizing a more operational role.

heads of

Uses "heads" instead of "directors", offering a simpler and more informal term.

leaders in

Substitutes "directors" with "leaders", highlighting a broader leadership function rather than a specific title.

supervisors of

Replaces "directors" with "supervisors", focusing on an oversight role.

coordinators for

Emphasizes the coordination aspect of the role, replacing "directors" with "coordinators".

those in charge of

Offers a more descriptive and less formal alternative to "directors".

officials responsible for

Provides a formal and precise substitute for "directors".

governing body of

Replaces "directors" with "governing body", focusing on the collective leadership.

executive team for

Uses "executive team" to denote a high-level leadership group, replacing "directors".

FAQs

How is "directors for" typically used in a sentence?

The phrase "directors for" is commonly used to specify the area or purpose that the directors are responsible for, such as "directors for marketing" or "directors for the project".

What are some alternatives to "directors for" that I can use?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "managers of", "leaders in", or "heads of".

Is there a difference between "directors for" and "directors of"?

Yes, "directors of" generally refers to membership in a board, while "directors for" specifies a responsibility or area, like "directors of the board" versus "directors for the project".

In what contexts is it most appropriate to use the phrase "directors for"?

It's most appropriate when specifying a particular project, initiative, or department for which the directors are responsible. Examples include "directors for research and development" or "directors for the fundraising campaign".