directly with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "directly with" is grammatically correct and can be used in written English.
It is typically used to indicate a direct or immediate relationship or involvement with something or someone. For example: 1. "I am directly responsible for managing all of the company's finances." 2. "The CEO will be meeting directly with the shareholders to discuss the new merger." 3. "Please communicate directly with your supervisor if you have any concerns." 4. "The artist worked directly with the curator to select the pieces for the exhibition." 5. "The politician has been accused of interfering directly with the judicial process."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

57 human-written examples

& to work directly with him.

The New Yorker

Israel does not deal directly with Hamas.

The New York Times

Buyers negotiate directly with the artist.

The New York Times - Arts

Their only phone connect directly with headquarters.

The New Yorker

Iodine combines directly with many elements.

Encyclopedia Britannica

We work directly with farmers.

The New York Times

Counselors communicate directly with professors.

The New York Times - Magazine

I worked directly with Don.

The New York Times

Dunleavy negotiated directly with Brand.

The New York Times - Sports

"Businessmen now interface directly with the government".

The New York Times

They should communicate directly with their customers.

The Guardian - Opinion

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "directly with", ensure the context clearly indicates a lack of intermediaries or intervening steps. This clarifies the relationship or interaction you're describing.

Common error

Don't use "directly with" when a more precise term would better describe the nature of the interaction, such as "through" or "via", to avoid misleading readers about the directness of the connection.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "directly with" functions as a prepositional phrase, typically modifying a verb or noun to indicate a direct relationship, interaction, or connection. Ludwig shows numerous examples of this usage across various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

39%

Science

24%

Wiki

12%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

1%

Formal & Business

1%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "directly with" is a common and grammatically correct prepositional phrase used to denote a direct connection or interaction, as supported by Ludwig. It appears frequently in News & Media and Scientific contexts, suggesting its versatility. While it's generally neutral in tone, it's important to ensure the context accurately reflects the intended directness to avoid ambiguity. Consider alternatives like "in direct contact with" or "in close association with" for nuanced expression.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

in direct contact with

Emphasizes the state of being in direct communication or physical proximity.

in immediate relation to

Highlights a close and unbroken connection or relevance.

in close association with

Stresses the partnership or close working relationship.

interacting personally with

Focuses on the human aspect of the interaction.

liaising straight with

Highlights the act of coordination and communication.

dealing one-on-one with

Implies a personal and exclusive interaction.

connecting immediately with

Emphasizes the speed and immediacy of the connection.

communicating firsthand with

Focuses on the directness of the communication without intermediaries.

engaging intimately with

Suggests a deep and personal involvement.

working hands-on with

Emphasizes practical involvement and direct participation.

FAQs

How can I use "directly with" in a sentence?

You can use "directly with" to indicate a direct interaction or relationship. For example, "The CEO communicated "directly with" the shareholders" or "The software integrates "directly with" the existing system".

What are some alternatives to "directly with"?

Alternatives include phrases like "in direct contact with", "in immediate relation to", or "in close association with" depending on the specific context.

Is it always necessary to specify "directly with" or is "with" sufficient?

Whether you need to specify "directly with" depends on the context. If it's important to emphasize the lack of intermediaries, then "directly with" is appropriate. Otherwise, "with" may suffice.

What's the difference between ""directly with"" and "indirectly with"?

"Directly with" implies a direct, unmediated interaction or relationship, while "indirectly with" suggests that there are intermediaries or intervening steps.