Sentence examples for directly prohibited from inspiring English sources

Not only have campaigning activities been directly prohibited but an atmosphere has been created that scares off charities from campaigning.

If the fallacy succeeds the result is that there will be no deduction: begging the question and non-cause are directly prohibited by the second and third conditions respectively of being a deduction (SR 6 168b23).

The Court also explicitly upheld the "discriminatory effect" prong of Section 5, stating that even though the Fifteenth Amendment directly prohibited only intentional discrimination, Congress could constitutionally prohibit unintentional discrimination to mitigate the risk that jurisdictions may engage in intentional discrimination.

Galun refers to two other Jewish philosophers and religious scholars, E. Goldschmidt and A. Maoz, who submit that, based on Jewish religious laws and traditions, the development of transgenic plants by researchers are permissible if they are not directly prohibited by God and if the research will benefit mankind.

"Although nothing in the Public Officers Law directly prohibits such disclosure," the letter continued, "such a prohibition is entirely consistent with the provisions of the Freedom of Information Law and the Open Meetings Law.

Most journalistic outlets discourage or directly prohibit campaign contributions by employees.

Whereas disarmament agreements usually directly prohibit the possession or production of weapons, arms-control agreements often proceed by setting limitations on the testing, deployment, or use of certain types of weapons.

This "results test" contrasts with the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments, both of which directly prohibit only purposeful discrimination.

Crossroads' prejudicial denial of the legitimacy of rights of LGBT persons is in conflict with the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, which directly prohibits discrimination based on sexual orientation.

The Supreme Court left intact the part of the Voting Rights Act that directly prohibits discriminatory voting rules, and they can still be challenged in court after they're passed.

Justice Scalia's telling question, paraphrased here, was: Why can't Congress simply require insurance companies to cover everyone regardless of whether they're sick and directly prohibit them from charging sick people more than healthy people?