Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(18)
The existence of such directions were not disclosed until last year.
In contrast, the frequency of mis-indexing was significantly reduced by using the measured OR, where the close packed planes and directions were not parallel.
The differences of results for ultimate strength (max. 281 MPa; min. 240 MPa), strain at fracture (max. 45.3 mm/m; min. 32.6 mm/m) and elastic modulus (max. 9.9 GPa; min. 6.8 GPa) in these directions were not statistically significant.
My directions were NOT very helpful and may result in massive bleeding.
We believe that the unusual directions were not influenced by the NRM of the underlying plateau-forming basalts (Kwanghaeak Basalts).
Moreover the directions were not even self-consistent: a ren zi direction is followed by a zi direction which ought to indicate a steer towards a more easterly direction by ~7.5°, but instead it was drawn towards a more westerly direction.
Similar(42)
Google's directions weren't great in the app's early days either, and they're still not always perfect.
Dimensions in other directions are not contracted.
Directions are not time limited.
The part of the app that gives subway directions is not ideal, however.
The contact materials are dissimilar materials, so that commensurability and mismatch of the crystalline directions are not applicable.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com