The phrase "direct subsidiary" is correct and can be used in written English.
It refers to a company that is wholly owned and controlled by another company, meaning that it is a direct subsidiary of that company. You can use this phrase when discussing the structure or ownership of companies, such as in a business report or legal document. For example: - "XYZ Corporation is the direct subsidiary of ABC Holdings." - "The board of directors of the direct subsidiary has approved the merger with its parent company." - "The direct subsidiary operates independently, but follows the same policies and procedures as its parent company."
* Neil Fox, chairman and chief executive at Lowe Fox Pavlika, New York, the direct marketing subsidiary of Lowe Lintas & Partners Worldwide, is leaving.
Norfolk Broads Direct, a subsidiary of Broads Tours, (44-1603) 782-207 and www.broads.co.uk, rents fully outfitted houseboats for three to seven nights.
The space in the Midtown tower will be vacated by Grey Direct, a subsidiary of Grey Advertising, which will move into existing Grey space.
RBS floated its Direct Line subsidiary on Thursday at 175p a share, and the insurer closed at 186.5p, down 1.5p on the day.
It shows an indubitable interrelation between these three branches and that climate change cannot be addressed without referring to human rights or migration - as direct or subsidiary effects.
AMPCo Direct, a subsidiary of the Australian Medical Association, maintains a comprehensive list of doctors in Australia, including information on their sex, date of birth, specialty and subspeciality, and practice location.
As described elsewhere, 13 we supplemented administrative data from the Commissions with additional doctor-level variables obtained from a database on Australian doctors held by AMPCo Direct, a subsidiary of the Australian Medical Association.
To guarantee the loan, Salesforce is pledging 100percentt of the equity securities of their direct domestic subsidiaries and 65percentt of the equity securities of their direct foreign subsidiaries, subject to certain exceptions and limitations.
Word of the program emerged when The Guardian posted an April order from the secret foreign intelligence court directing a subsidiary of Verizon Communications to give the N.S.A. "on an ongoing daily basis" until July logs of communications "between the United States and abroad" or "wholly within the United States, including local telephone calls".
Judge Vincent Broderick gave Bonifaz more than a year to dig through Texaco's files for evidence that company officials at New York headquarters had directed the subsidiary to dump waste.
