Exact(51)
If this is all that direct realism amounts to, then it is not a genuinely distinct epistemological alternative.[14] Is there any further way to make sense of the "directness" to which direct realist appeals, one that might yield more interesting epistemological results?
What about the second direct realist reading (Hoffman's)?
Thomas Reid held a direct realist theory of memory.
Relatively recently scholars have introduced a possible alternative reading, which is called the direct realist reading.
This is at least part of the motivation for direct realist views (see below).
What is unfamiliar is his direct realist position, according to which sense-data are physical.
Similar(9)
Other direct realists, such as the perceptual psychologist James J. Gibson (1904 79), rejected sense-data theory altogether, claiming that the surfaces of physical objects are normally directly observed.
In their epistemology, whereas the Vaibhashikas are direct realists, the Sautrantikas hold a sort of representationism, according to which the external world is only inferred from the mental conceptions that alone are directly apprehended.
Some direct realists, such as Moore and his followers, continued to accept the existence of sense-data, but unlike traditional realists they held that, rather than mental entities, sense data might be physical parts of the surface of the perceived object itself.
The early perceptual theorists, especially direct realists, were cognitivist about pain's negative affect.
Like earlier direct realists, strong representationalists tend to be naturalists or physicalists.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com