Sentence examples for direct justification for from inspiring English sources

Since reproducible intrapatient diversity likely reflects fitness costs of mutations in vivo, our results provide a direct justification for this approach.

Until now, basic studies providing a direct justification for the use of the BET surface as a dose metric in lung inflammation have not been presented.

Finally, the point made in the Discussion about how your results provide direct justification for past efforts to extract universal fitness landscapes of HIV from cross-sectional data might be considered for inclusion in the introduction as well (e.g., Dahirel, PNAS (2011); Fergusson, Immunity (2013); Mann PLOS CB (2014)).

cWe could not find a direct justification for this marked difference in attitude among nurses (compared to the other cadres), but one explanation could be that since early nursing institutes in India were mainly run by Christian missionaries, the population selecting into the nursing profession is attuned toward service.

Meanwhile, in contrast to the scientific debate, we find no direct justification to reject nudging, especially within the realm of health behavior for which consumers understand the benefits of promoted behaviors nudging strategies.

The same can be said about education in the United States, which focuses understandably but disproportionately on the loss of life at Pearl Harbor as a direct or implicit justification for the nuclear bombing of Hiroshima.

Policy makers did so reluctantly, however, knowing that under the theory of the educational marketplace, there was no justification for direct intervention.

There was nothing but buzz words like freedom, bravery and sacrifice, as well as flag waving and ideology, but no direct connection to, nor justification for, the invasion and occupation of Iraq.

"Winning the argument and then watching those in power continue to favour vested interests over the truth is what drives people to stop arguing and start taking action - there is no need or justification for direct action when democracy is working as intended, but it so rarely does".

The implications of these conclusions are important: if SMBG for this population is clinically inefficacious, then there is little justification for directing sparse clinical and financial resources to support SMBG.

We classed reviews as higher quality when justification for including direct and indirect evidence was given; and when the results from trials contributing direct evidence were presented.