direct consequences

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "direct consequences" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to refer to immediate or straightforward results that arise from a specific action or event. Example: "The direct consequences of the policy change were felt immediately by the employees."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The distrust of Western medical workers has had direct consequences.

The New York Times

First, climate change is a pollution problem with direct consequences.

The New York Times

These changes are not direct consequences of Sept. 11; they are more about economics than safety.

The New York Times - Travel

"In high school there are direct consequences for not doing your homework," he says.

The New York Times

The outcome of the Vienna talks will have direct consequences at home for Rouhani.

The Guardian

Precious little time is given over to the direct consequences of that action.

The Guardian - TV & Radio

This is a direct consequences of the high economic growth that India saw after 2004.

The New York Times

"Because there are very direct consequences as relates to the quality of life and the budget".

The New York Times

If the attack is confirmed as a terror incident there are two immediate direct consequences for the UK.

The Guardian

The direct consequences of climate change will reach America long after Africa, the Near East and China have been transformed.

The Guardian

Some direct consequences follow from Theorem 2.1.

Boundary Value Problems

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing causality, clearly identify the action or event that leads to the "direct consequences" to strengthen your argument.

Common error

Avoid attributing all outcomes solely to one cause. Recognize that multiple factors often contribute, and what may seem like "direct consequences" could have intermediate influences.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "direct consequences" functions as a noun phrase, often serving as the subject or object of a sentence. Ludwig AI shows it describes the immediate and clear results of an action or event.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

40%

News & Media

35%

Formal & Business

15%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "direct consequences" is a common and grammatically correct way to describe the immediate outcomes of an action or event. As Ludwig AI indicates, it's employed across various domains, including science, news, and formal writing, highlighting the causal relationship between actions and their results. When using this phrase, ensure you clearly identify the cause to strengthen your argument, but also acknowledge that outcomes often have multiple contributing factors. Be mindful of overstating the directness, as results are not always caused by the same action. The phrase is versatile and can refer to both positive and negative outcomes.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

immediate repercussions

Emphasizes the immediacy of the results.

inevitable outcomes

Highlights the unavoidable nature of the results.

ensuing effects

Focuses on the effects that follow closely after an event.

resulting impacts

Stresses the impact or influence caused by something.

logical conclusions

Highlights the rational or predictable nature of the results.

predictable results

Emphasizes the foreseeability of the outcomes.

unavoidable sequelae

A more formal term for consequences that are impossible to prevent.

downstream effects

Implies a chain of events where one action leads to further consequences.

proximate consequences

Highlights consequences that are closely linked and directly caused.

tangible outcomes

Focuses on consequences that are concrete and easily observed.

FAQs

What are some synonyms for "direct consequences"?

Alternatives include "immediate repercussions", "ensuing effects", or "resulting impacts". The best choice depends on the specific context.

How can I use "direct consequences" in a sentence?

For example: "The policy change had "direct consequences" on employee morale" or "Failing to complete the assignment will have "direct consequences" on your grade."

What is the difference between "direct consequences" and "indirect consequences"?

"Direct consequences" are immediate and easily attributable to a specific cause. "Indirect consequences" are secondary effects that may emerge later or be less obviously linked to the initial cause.

Are "direct consequences" always negative?

No, "direct consequences" can be either positive or negative. They simply refer to the immediate results of an action or event.