Concerning intracortical lesions this effect was only significant for the DIR (p < 0.0001; adjusted for multiple comparisons, p < 0.0001) but not for the FLAIR (p = 0.40; adjusted for multiple comparisons, p = 1) and T2 TSE sequences (p = 0.49; adjusted for multiple comparisons, p = 1).
Separated by the different pulse sequences, it became obvious that this interaction was driven by a significantly increased detection rate for FLAIR (p = 0.0026; adjusted for multiple comparisons, p = 0.0078) and DIR (p < 0.0001; adjusted for multiple comparisons, p < 0.0001) but not for T2 TSE (p = 1) regarding infratentorial lesions.
Metformin monotherapy showed significant increase in body weight compared to DIR rats (P < 0.001) and a significant decrease when compared to normal rats (P < 0.01).
Compared with non-diabetic MI/R (NIR) group, myocardial superoxide generation was significantly increased in diabetic MI/R (DIR) group (P < 0.01), and up-regulation of SIRT1 inhibited superoxide accumulation (Fig. 5a, n = 6, P < 0.01 vs. DIR group).
The "FFD with MI on filtered CTs" DSC values were superior to the DSC values of 7 among the 9 other DIR methods (P < 0.05).
The optical power [Watt] of monochromatic light is related to the illuminance and is expressed as: P dir = I 0 · cos m ϕ 683 · V λ · D d 2 · cos ψ (10).
Therefore, the illuminance and received optical power calculations involve integration over the wavelengths occupied by the light and passed by the receiver optical filter: P dir = I 0 cos m ϕ 683 D d 2 cos ψ ∫ 390 720 V λ P λ d λ (11).
Although many mice completely cleared the infection, there was no difference in Salmonella prevalence (57% and 47%, respectively; Chi-square test, χ2 = 0.31, d.f. = 1, P dir = 0.36).
= 4, P dir = 0.02] measured by average of the four female preference behaviours, whereas neither the female inbreeding status (interaction term: OB versus IB male × female inbreeding status: F = 1.6, d.f. = 4, P = 0.19) or experimental infection (interaction term: OB vs IB × male infection status: F = 0.2, d.f. = 4, P dir = 0.59) had no significant effects on female preference for outbred males.
When testing the inbred and outbred females separately, inbred females investigated the scent marks of outbred males significantly more often compared to the scent marks of inbred males (paired samples t-test, t = 4.50, d.f. = 23, P dir = 0.0001), but outbred females did not show any clear preference (paired samples t-test, t = 0.79, d.f. = 24, P dir = 0.44, Fig. 1a).
There was a statistically non-significant trend for lower mortality in the outbred males compared to the inbred ones (27% and 46%, respectively; Chi-square test, χ2 = 2.07, d.f. = 1, P dir = 0.09).
