Each dimension is evaluated in 3 categories (no problem, moderate problems, or extreme problems).
Cardiac function and heart dimensions were evaluated by echocardiography and in vivo blood pressure measurements as described.
Finally, while a broad range of comorbidities are discussed, formal DSM-based personality disorder diagnoses were not evaluated, as personality dimensions were evaluated using a dimensional approach in the five-factor model and specific evaluation of impulsivity.
In this study, the following dimensions were evaluated: physical functioning, physical role, vitality, social functioning, emotional role, and mental health.
Also, concerning the greatest dimension 24 out of 35 lesions (68.6%) less than 10 mm in the greatest dimension were evaluated as either in-situ carcinoma or micro-invasive tumour within the muscle layer.
Tumors were evaluated in three dimensions, and maximal tumor diameter was ascertained.
Brackets of the same prescription were evaluated in both slot dimensions.
Outputs were evaluated in from 1 to 6 dimensions and the optimal dimensionality identified as that in which the stress was significantly (P<0.05) better than random and in which the addition of another dimension reduced ordination stress only slightly.
Correlations were evaluated in four different domains: Comparison (the first tensor dimension), Time and Frequency (the second tensor dimension), and Causal outflow (the third tensor dimension).
Features from the nucleus morphology, the MST, and the fractal dimension were evaluated from functions available in the Matlab software.
