Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(3)
From the result of [24], we know that the dimension of each of these transmit subspaces of (mathcal {T}_{1}) is as follows: begin{array}{*{20}l} text{dim},mathcal{T}_{12} &= 2{L}_{T_{2}} |Psi_{T_{12}}|, end{array} (31).
Note that ( mathcal {R}_{1} = mathcal {R}_{11} oplus mathcal {R}_{12setminus 11}. ) From the result of [24], we know the dimension of each of the above base-station receive subspaces is as follows: begin{array}{*{20}l} text{dim}, mathcal{R}_{11} &= 2{L}_{R_{1}} |Psi_{R_{11}}|, end{array} (40).
The dimensions of ν f are [L 2 T − 1], those of both u and w are [LT − 1], and finally [L] is the dimension of each of a and r, which when used in Eq. (14), give ( Fleft(=frac{aw}{2{nu}_{mathrm{f}}}right) ) and ( {F}_{eta}left =-frac{a^2u}{r{nu}_{mathrm{F}_{eta}left =-frac{a^2u}{r{nu}onless velocities in the axial and radial directions, respectively, between the porous disks.
Similar(57)
What were the dimensions of each of those stadiums down the foul lines and to dead center field?
That figure is based on the standard dimensions of each of those elements, plus the space you'll need for meeting code requirements and moving through the room.
In addition, two cylindrical samples (of the same dimensions) of each of the twelve sandstones were prepared perpendicular to the borehole (i.e. parallel to bedding).
The dimensions of each of the described regions (upstream, middle, and downstream) are 4,400 µm (or 4.4 mm) long by 800 µm wide.
Cross sections of each channel were measured using a microscope to determine the actual dimensions of each of the channels.
The interior dimensions of each of the two units measured approximately 23.5 mm (wide) × 25 mm (deep) × 75 mm (tall).
Quantitatively, the dimensions of each of the first 17 leaves (in each plant), including leaf width, leaf length, and petiole length, increased dramatically in the 35S BrGRF8 transgenic plants compared with their dimensions in the vector control plants.
Secondly, there were only small variations in responses on the dimensions of each of the instruments with most respondents (at least 85%%) classifying themselves within the top two response categories for instrument dimensions.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com