Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Following left IPS TMS, digits significantly differed from verbal numbers and zero (verbal numbers vs. digits t (5) = 2.9, P = 0.01; verbal numbers vs. zero, t (5) = 3.27, P = 0.01; digits vs. zero, t (5) = −1.17, P = 0.3).
Similar(59)
Following TMSA to the left IPS, digits differed significantly from verbal numbers and zero (digit vs. verbal numbers t (6) = 3.07, P = 0.01; digits vs. zero, t (6) = 2.51, P = 0.02; verbal number vs. zero, t (6) = −0.83, P = 0.44).
Although TOJ thresholds for the unilateral digits were significantly elevated with the presence of a 25 Hz periodic conditioning stimuli, there was no elevation in the TOJ when non-periodic conditioning stimuli were delivered (either synchronously or asynchronously) concurrent with the TOJ task (p > 0.72).
Guidance for 2016 is for sales of $2.0-$2.0-$2.1bnghtly belourour forecasts, and margin guidance in the generics business, which now includes Roxane, of low double-digits is significantly below our estimates.
Runs and home runs per game are down slightly compared with last season and the number of teams scoring in the double digits has fallen significantly.
Kruskal-Wallis tests of locomotor index ratios in digit pairs shows that most between-digit relationships are significantly different between locomotor types.
If slopes for digit strings were significantly larger than for pseudowords, but similarly to dot patterns, digits (similar to dots) were processed in a more decomposed manner than pseudowords.
Phalacrocorax are unique in having a digit IV that is significantly longer than digit III, often by nearly an entire phalanx.
The distribution of digit sucking differed significantly between the two groups.
Digit span correlated significantly with future reading ability at every stage.
In addition, independently of sex, higher 2D:4digitit ratios were significantly associated with higher scores (ρ=.14, p=.006).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com