Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
The outcome measures for experiment 1 were average level across frequency bands (dB SPL), across all whispered utterances (dB A), within digit deviation (dB A) and across digit deviation (dB A).
Similar(59)
Average level (dB sound pressure level) across frequency, average level across all utterances (dB A) and within/across-digit deviation (dB A) for experiment 1. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of WVT for experiment 2. In experiment 1, OE whisperers were 8 10 dB more intense than inexperienced whisperers across all whispered utterances.
In addition, previous studies concentrated on the first digit, derived the deviation of the distribution under consideration from the NBL by calculating or approximating the respective integrals, and did not consider functions of random variables.
Our primary approach uses the IQ estimate derived with the Digit Span standard deviation.
0.840 0.003 2.069 0.007 18.24 0.20 15.31 0.17 38.01 0.41 Analytical uncertainties are indicated in parenthesis with last significant digits (1 standard deviation of analysis).
In this particular case, there are two possible approaches to rescaling (Table 2): One uses the standard deviation for Digit Span (because the latent variable is assumed to be on the same scale as Digit Span), whereas the second uses the estimated standard deviation of the latent variable itself, obtained as part of the SEM fitting procedure.
As derived theoretically by Engel and Leuenberger [17] and also shown numerically by Leemis, Schmeiser and Evans [18], however for the leading digit only, the maximal absolute deviation is less than 0.03.
The errors are given in terms of mean ± standard deviation, approximated to the second digit for the modulus and to the first digit for the phase.
The soft tissue growth is more marked on the volar aspect, leading to dorsal deviation of the involved digits, as in our case.
This gained further support when investigating the standard deviations for each target digit, with the greatest variation evident for digits 11 and 13 for Year 1 participants.
This corresponds with an expected clinically relevant difference of 3 points and a standard deviation of 5 on the subtest Digit span from the WISC-III.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com