Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
It is found that a range of molecular diffusivity exist in which average false diffusion is smaller than molecular diffusion and scalar decay rates can be computed accurately with CFD in the mixer.
A method is developed to quantitatively measure the effect of false diffusion on scalar decay rate.
A larger time step will increase the false diffusion, and thus smooth the gradients of the flow field.
To achieve accuracy, the weighting functions are properly chosen so that false diffusion errors can be largely suppressed by the equipped streamline operator.
Ray effects due to angular discretization and errors due to domain decomposition are minimized until small variations are introduced by these effects in order to focus on the influence of flux limiters on errors due to spatial discretization, known as numerical diffusion, smearing or false scattering.
Overall, the ETA network diffusion markedly reduces false positives.
Errors were ranked as follows: very major error, false-susceptible result by the disc diffusion test; major error, false-resistant result produced by the disc diffusion test; and minor error, intermediate result by disc diffusion method and a resistant or susceptible category for the reference method (microdilution test).
Interpolation errors and false numerical diffusion decreased as well.
3D: Three Dimensional; DTI: Diffusion tensor imaging; FDR: False discovery rate; Gd: Gadolinium; KD: Ketogenic diet; MCTs: Monocarboxylate transporters; MRI: Magnetic resonance imaging; P: Postnatal day; PBS: Phosphate buffered saline; PFA: Para-formaldehyde.
Recent studies have demonstrated that the use of cefoxitin disk diffusion susceptibility testing produces false negative results when screening for methicillin resistance in veterinary isolates of S. pseudintermedius [ 14, 15].
The difference is largest near 97% sensitivity where ETA network diffusion has 4-fold fewer false positives (90% vs 60% accuracy).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com