Sentence examples for difficulty when compared from inspiring English sources

Another surprising result was that the presence of visible partitions in B2 did not greatly decrease the difficulty when compared to B3 (72 versus 71%).

Cannulation of the LIJV is associated with a higher complication rate and a perceived increased level of difficulty when compared with cannulation of the RIJV.

Across each of these four domains, proportionally more men not in remission reported some difficulty when compared with those either in remission or unsure of their remission status.

53 In the PRESTO trial, subjects taking rasagiline reported more weight loss, vomiting, anorexia, dyskinesia and balance difficulty when compared with the placebo group.

In a European multi-centre trial, it was demonstrated that high-quality bowel preparation was associated with a higher rate of complete examination, shortened procedural time and lower rate of procedure difficulty when compared with low-quality bowel preparation [ 6].

52 Although comparative statistical analyses have not been employed in all of the above studies, the evidence suggests that dapoxetine (30 mg or 60 mg) is associated with an improvement in ejaculation-related interpersonal difficulty when compared with placebo.

One difficulty when comparing measurements is to evaluate the reliability of the different experimental techniques.

Self-reported measures are susceptible to biases (tendency to answer positively, give more socially acceptable answers, etc).. Another study limitation is the validity and reliability of knowledge assessments by questionnaires, which can be questioned because of the absence of standardization and difficulty when comparing them across studies[38], [39], [40].

A major difficulty when comparing results across studies is the difference in the age cutoff used to define early onset.

One difficulty when comparing seed dormancy and germination between taxa is the intra-taxon variation (Probert et al., 1985; Schütz and Milberg, 1997; Andersson and Milberg, 1998; Keller and Kollman, 1999; Pezzani and Montaña, 2006).

Unexplained variance in 1st contrast, a potential secondary dimension in the data, is generally accepted to be not more than 5% (monitoring multidimensionality). Uniform DIF was analysed to explore the stability of item difficulty when comparing childhood cancer survivors to a comparison group.