Sentence examples for difficulty discrimination from inspiring English sources

Do the questions and tests generated from ontologies have satisfactory difficulty, discrimination and reliability values?

First, it assesses the auto-generated questions' difficulty, discrimination, and reliability using two statistical methods: Classical Test Theory (CTT) and Item Response Theory (IRT).

Question's difficulty, discrimination, and reliability values depend on the sample of students and the ability of students depends on the assessment test.

This experiment aims to answer two main questions: 1. Do the questions and tests generated from ontologies have satisfactory difficulty, discrimination and reliability values?   2.

It would be expected that using the three-parameter logistic IRT (difficulty, discrimination, and guessing), CATSIB could accurately and consistently detect DIF on an MSCAT of English proficiency among different focal and reference groups.

However, Taguchi et al. did not report reliability coefficients for their instrument, nor did they provide individual item statistics (e.g., difficulty, discrimination, and fit statistics) and results of the distractor analysis.

Research has thus suggested that economic difficulties, discrimination and language difficulties are among the most important resettlement challenges for refugees [ 12, 13].

The relative difficulties, discrimination and 'guessabilities' of each theme of question were compared with each other using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA).

When the number of items is fixed and the number of options is manipulated, mixed results and recommendations are reported; while some studies have identified a small or negligible change in item difficulty or discrimination for different option numbers [ 7, 14- 17], others have found decreases in difficulty and discrimination for smaller option numbers [ 3].

Our item analysis showed that the questions' difficulty and discrimination indices were in agreement with published recommended standards and discriminated effectively between high- and low-scoring students.

Analyses of item difficulty, item discrimination and generalizability indicated that the eLCQC provides high-quality evaluations.