Sentence examples for differing scientific from inspiring English sources
This multi-faceted approach engages a diverse group of researchers from differing scientific backgrounds, both expanding our understanding of basic chemical and biological processes and using these discoveries to investigate the brain.
This multi-faceted approach engages a diverse group of researchers from differing scientific backgrounds, expanding our understanding of basic chemical and biological processes, and using these discoveries to investigate the brain.
Mourad Kahoul, president of an association representing industrial fishing fleets in France, Italy and Spain, said that his group "is doing everything it can to change the government's mind on this," and that there were differing scientific views on the outlook for the fish.
Difficulties that stakeholders in other sectors face in understanding health research evidence may be due to differing scientific paradigms across sectors.
His ruling: after looking at the "differing scientific opinions on this subject, the issue appears to be equivocal at this time".
We suggested in an earlier article (Mead and Scott 2010) that the differing scientific and student interpretations of two concepts commonly used in teaching evolution, purpose and design, may exacerbate such a position.
Generally, citation practices seem to differ significantly across different scientific disciplines, which complicates the definition of universal citation-based impact measures.
The utility of visual explanations may differ for scientific phenomena that are more abstract, or contain elements that are invisible due to their scale.
They studied 110 college students enrolled in non-majors' introductory biology and identified three major ways that student conceptions differed from scientific conceptions.
Other cognitive or quasi-cognitive accounts of the aesthetic appreciation of environments differ from scientific cognitivism concerning either the kind of cognitive resources taken to be relevant to such appreciation or the degree to which these resources are considered relevant.
Even if Summers' critics are entirely correct--and there is no real evidence that men and women differ in scientific talent--what then is the explanation for the disparity in careers?
