Differing evaluations of Fraga at his death reflect the deep division in Spanish society.
It differs from other evaluation methods (such as quality assurance testing and product demonstrations) in that users try to complete tasks with a product on their own, with little help.
The evaluation methods differ in their scope, user friendliness, and how criteria are weighted and summarized.
Also, the result from the four evaluation methods differed at a surprisingly high rate.
The four evaluation methods differ in scope, user friendliness, and how criteria are weighted and summarized.
This implies that variation in omitted variables has only limited correlation with independent variables in our sample, which in turn means that our interpretations about how evaluation methods differ based on variation in uncertainty and controversy should have only limited bias.
Two immunohistochemical studies examined the prognostic significance of ALDH1 in pancreatic cancer, but their results conflict, perhaps because the evaluation methods differed (using tissue microarrays [ 15] vs. whole-mount tissue slides [ 16]).
Firstly, even in a relatively homogeneous context of community-based health promotion interventions aimed at African Americans or Hispanics living in the US, planning and evaluation methods differed significantly.
Moreover, the proportion of affected horses differed significantly between the 2 evaluation methods (Manual palpation = 46.8%, Questionnaire = 22%, χ = 49.3, p < 0.001).
Regarding relevance, ring test results show that the total percentage of studies categorized as "relevant without/with restrictions" did not differ between the CRED and Klimisch evaluation methods.
For one of the eight studies (study H), results of the relevance evaluations differed significantly between the Klimisch and CRED evaluation methods (Fig. 2b; Additional file 1: part D Table D2) with a higher percentage of studies categorized as "relevant without restrictions" when using the CRED evaluation method.
