Sentence examples for differentiated score from inspiring English sources

Adenocarcinoma of the prostate was pathologically confirmed in all the cases, and the Gleason score (highly differentiated, score 2-5; modifferentiatedrentiated, score 6-7; poorly differentiated, score 8-10) was evaluated by pathologists working at each hospital using the Gleason scoring system [ 21].

These aforementioned issues may cause differentiated scores on the SIGH-SAD and BDI inventories.

Interestingly, this differentiated scoring in addition to tree labeling resulted in reconstruction of "parsimonious" evolutionary scenario.

Screening tests with differentiated scores on an ordinal scale may also be more similar to clinical practice than screening tests on a nominal scale, why the necessity of evaluating the reliability as well as the predictive validity of screening tests becomes clear.

Patients whose tumors were moderately or poorly differentiated (Gleason score 5-10) were less likely to receive conservative treatment than patients with well differentiated tumors (Gleason score 2-4).

The histological features of PAC120 xenografts were those of a poorly differentiated, Gleason score 9 (5+4), conventional prostate adenocarcinoma, without any evidence of mucus secretion.

Since we retrieve all 'best' mapping positions, reads mapping equally well to multiple genome sites may be artificially differentiated by score based on the matching of the 5′ end color.

Maspin expression was inversely correlated with the Gleason score and positively correlated with lower tumor stage, more differentiated grade and a lower p53 protein mutation [63, 64].

Based on the overall tumor grade according to the combined scores for nuclear grade, tubule formation and mitotic rate, 2 FMAs were well differentiated (grade 1) tumors, 15 moderately differentiated (grade II) tumors, and 7 poorly differentiated (grade 3).

Prostate cancer tissues were classified as moderately differentiated (Gleason scores 5 6) or poorly differentiated (Gleason scores 8 9).

Established scales such as the AIS provide a differentiated severity scoring (7 categories); however, its utility for population-based research is limited due to the time-consuming assignment of scores [ 84].