Sentence examples for different variance coefficients from inspiring English sources

Table 5 Influence of reverse rhythm formation parameters' synthetic variation on oil recovery under different variance coefficients Variance coefficient Oil recovery prediction Difference in recovery prediction Neglect parameters' variation Consider parameters' variation 0 43.86 45.72 1.86 0.3 44.42 46.62 2.20 0.5 43.28 45.60 2.32 0.7 40.24 43.67 3.43 0.9 31.32 32.97 1.65.

Relationship between water cut and oil recovery under different variance coefficients when considering reservoir parameters' variation is shown in Fig. 5a.

Figure 5b and Table 4 show the variability of the influence degree of reservoir parameters' alteration on development effect under different variance coefficients.

The influence of reservoir parameters' variation on development effect under different variance coefficients is discussed in positive rhythm formation and reverse rhythm formation, respectively.

Open image in new window Fig. 6 a Relationship between water cut and oil recovery under different variance coefficients of reverse rhythm formation, and b influence of reverse rhythm formation parameters' variation on oil recovery.

In Particular, it was found that different surfaces show significantly different variance in their friction coefficients.

The variance coefficients of different reservoir micro-parameters' influence degree are concluded in Table 2.

In the positive rhythm formation, when considering or neglecting the reservoir parameters' variation, the production performance is simulated in different cases of variance coefficient, which is, respectively, 0, 0.5, 0.7, 0.7, and 0.9.

In the reverse rhythm formation, when considering or neglecting the reservoir parameters' variation, the production performance is simulated in different cases of variance coefficient, which is, respectively, 0, 0.5, 0.7, 0.7, and 0.9.

However, in reverse rhythm formations, the synthetic influence on oil development rules has a peak when the variance coefficient is different.

In Sol of mdx mice, we observed a higher variance coefficient not significantly different to wild-type mice (C57BL/10: 305.02 ± 87.04, mdx: 371.04 ± 53.53).