Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
Although the reasons for this discrepancies remain unknown, clearly rely to the different study designed used.
While a close replication attempts to duplicate experimental methods, a conceptual replication uses a distinctly different study designed to test the same hypothesis [ 17].
Similar(58)
Different studies designed to establish the contribution of other HLA and non-HLA genes have been published.
Therefore, it is advisable to check whether the size of the estimated regression coefficient differs between these different study designs.
This difference is possibly due to different study design and different study population recruited.
This difference may be due to different study designs and populations.
However, there were differences in the summary RR among different study designs.
Differing results across studies may be due to different study designs, emission levels, and exposure misclassification.
The difference in time may be caused by the different study design.
This difference may well be a consequence of the different study designs (in vitro versus in vivo).
The differences in results could probably be find in a different study design.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com