Fig. 16 Results of the Llobera and Sluckin simulation for walking patterns of a walker in a sloped environment at the different slope ranges.
Bray II AP had very low concentrations (0.25 mg kg−1 ± 0.26) among the different slope regions with no significant differences throughout (p > .05).05
The underlying reason is that the line predicting true endpoint from potential surrogate endpoint has a sufficiently different slope for each randomization group to make a substantial difference in the conclusion.
Predicted soil redistribution rates for different slope locations varied.
This translates into a different slope for each curve.
Three experiments with different slope angles were conducted.
Erosion rates for different slope positions estimated from REE concentrations correlated with those calculated from the DEMs with relative differences for different slope sections of 4 40%.
It can be seen from the figure that there are three different slope regions.
Different slope classes in the study area are shown in Fig. 4.
The model was further verified by simulating the same wave with different slope configurations.
Fig. 14 Slope map of the study area showing area covered by different slope classes.
