Exact(6)
Table 5 shows the variation across different residential settings.
As a consequence, the variance in comorbidity profiles in different residential settings can be evaluated.
However, the potential contamination is thought to be minimal because participants from the intervention and control groups come from different residential settings, each of which is managed by different staff.
These results suggest that using the Fried pre-clinical disability screening tool has facilitated the selection of a group of older Australian men and women from different residential settings with a comparable function and disability profile.
The strength of this study lies in the large number of male and female participants that were able to be selected from different residential settings using the screening tool.
We selected a group of people with a comparable function and disability profile, consistent with the pre-clinical stage of disability, from a sample of older Australian men and women from different residential settings using the Fried pre-clinical disability screening tool.
Similar(54)
Quadriceps muscle strength (measured using a strain gauge) was significantly different for men and women, but showed only a small difference between residential settings.
The sample consisted of 118 aged care recipients, aged 60 years and older, from four different types of aged care services: residential settings, including high care (one nursing home) and low care (two hostels), and community settings, including self-care (one retirement village) and community care (home care services), from the Sydney Metropolitan area.
Two levels of charging are typically available in residential settings.
Hence the laws restricting them in residential settings.
Moreover, respondents liked residential settings significantly more than urban settings, and preference increased significantly more with increasing entropy values in urban settings than in residential.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com