Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(6)
First, to further probe the differences between the 'true' substitution process and standard models, we assembled 21 large protein sequence alignments and used two different methods to test if and how empirical frequencies at sites differ from those simulated under the standard JTT + F + Γ substitution model.
There is also concern among some analysts that different countries could use different methods to test their banks, adding to the confusion.
Current and future studies employing different methods to test the accuracy and reliability of skull-photo/cranio-facial superimposition will enable researchers to establish the contribution the technique can have for identification purposes.
We used two different methods to test this hypothesis; we evaluated Aß plaque load by immunohistochemistry and also assessed Aß protein by ELISA in each of the different treatment groups (Tg2576+EUK189, Tg2576, Tg2576:sod2).
In this paper we employed two different methods to test the hypothesis of codivergence among our three focal groups.
Historical and adaptive approaches use different methods to test hypotheses; both can deliver usefully different insights, often on the same issues.
Similar(54)
We used three different established methods to test this possibility.
We used two different statistical methods to test the association between site conservation level and structural sensitivity.
To overcome the peculiarities of any one particular prediction algorithm, we applied five different statistical methods to test the accuracy of our signature-based prediction of disease progression.
At the same time, we applied six different Maximum Likelihood (ML) methods to test for potential positive selective pressures exerted at the gene level, and we also looked for evidence of positive selection at the deduced protein level.
Laaksonen et al. (2007) and Mäkinen et al. (2006) used the same dataset, but different methods, to simultaneously test the pathway model [ 31, 32].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com