Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(16)
Summarizing, there are only few sectors for which the outcomes of the different methods show a difference in the range of 1.0-3.5 1.0-3.5 sectors are clear outliers in the boxplots of Figure 1).
The Z-score distributions for structures derived by the three different methods show considerable differences (Supplementary Figure S4).
The two different methods show good agreement (r2 = 0.99), with an average difference of 8% between measurements made at the same times likely caused by spatial variability (Fig. 4).
Different methods show different scales and also different variation trend.
Catalysts prepared by different methods show different dynamic behavior.
Nanoparticles fabricated by different methods show various fancy characteristics in electronic, magnetic, optical, and catalytic applications.
Similar(44)
However, TA-PU films prepared by two different methods showed some differences in their appearance.
All the composites prepared by the different methods showed Ni homogenization within the metallic binder.
Polymers of SFO prepared by two different methods showed significant biodegradability against the fungal pathogen, Alternaria alternata.
The results indicated the samples renatured by two different methods showed similar secondary structures that were 7%% alpha-helix and 45%% beta-sheet.
The N2O fluxes measured by the different methods showed good agreement in magnitude and temporal dynamics, especially when the automatic chambers were in the eddy covariance mast footprint.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com