Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(8)
Statistical analyses showed that most, but not all of the tested dimensions were significantly different for both groups.
Propensity score adjustment created equal populations for all patient and injury characteristics except insurance status, which remained significantly different for both groups (data not shown).
The incidence of delirium, however, was not different for both groups.
Nor was the 6-year overall survival different for both groups after adjustment for the stage of the first tumour.
As we would also expect the interactions of these variables to be different for both groups, we believe these factors in aggregate may be responsible for our findings.
The need for re-intervention for persistent or recurrent dysphagia was not significantly different for both groups (40 vs 43%, respectively).
Similar(51)
We chose different patients for both groups.
Reasons for removal of the CVC were also not significantly different for both study groups (Table 3).
Moreover, the likely higher complication and morbidity rates of patients with diabetes and different responses to hyperglycemia suggest the need for the implementation of different treatment algorithms for both groups.
Moreover, common regions were induced among different addition tasks for both groups, including the SMA, left precentral sulcus (BA 6), insula, IPS, and adjacent parietal areas.
The model fit both male and female groups very well (characteristics of the models remained the same as mentioned above), but the regression weights for the different relationships between both groups were different (see Table 4).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com