Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
Having illustrated the key difference between empirical and theoretical discriminability, we now consider two recently proposed theories of why empirical discriminability (pAUC) differs for different eyewitness identification procedures.
According to this model, different eyewitness identification procedures are differentially susceptible to the deleterious effects of criterion variability.
Similar(58)
To incorporate criterial variability, we simulated different eyewitnesses using different values of the decision criterion (Smith et al., 2017; see also McAdoo & Gronlund, 2016).7 The criterion value for each simulation was drawn from a normal distribution (μ = csim, or csu, σ = y * csim, or csu, where y is a scaling parameter, coupling the amount of variability to the value of csim, or, csu).
As seven different eyewitnesses attested, they did so under the direction of Leven.
"It relies on mostly hearsay accounts and a faulty report, apparently stolen from an employee personnel file, which has been debunked by 9 different eyewitnesses," Harder, best known for representing Hulk Hogan in the lawsuit that bankrupted Gawker, explained in an email to the publication.
"Having been an eyewitness is very different from seeing it on TV," he said.
Or, as Justice Antonin Scalia put it, "Why is unreliable eyewitness identification any different from unreliable anything else?" Mr. Guerriero responded that eyewitness evidence is "probably the leading cause of miscarriages of justice" and should be treated with special care.
But factoring in the confidence of the eyewitness painted a different picture.
We had expected that CAC functions for 50 and 100 to-be-remembered stimuli would be much different from those in the eyewitness literature.
He showed that a class of eyewitnesses can report different information after seeing the same event.
This has been illustrated by the Chinese official media's line that only two Uyghurs were killed in Shaoguan and by the indictments related to the case; but, as the Guardian newspaper has reported, eyewitnesses tell a different story.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com