Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(60)
Inspection of Figures 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 reveals that the non-significant differences were in different directions for different species.
In control mice, 27 of the 51 differences were in the range of 15 30 % and only two differed by >30%%.
The differences were in what couldn't be replicated.
The only differences were in accent and in dialogue.
We found that the major differences were in internalized problems, specifically in anxiety/depression, and on Total Problems with the obese group.
These differences were in line with previous studies and provide evidence that this type of analysis may be useful for future assessment of SPCT in vivo.
Most measures showed statistically significant differences between students in "web" and "comparison" conditions at post-test, but only about half of the differences were in the hypothesized direction.
Furthermore, the biggest differences were in patients with non-cemented stems, and of those, the largest differences were seen in patients with fully coated CoCr stems.
Athough their differences were in the first instance political, arising out of the question of leadership, theological differences developed over time.
But the biggest differences were in the words people used in the free-form text they wrote about themselves on their profiles.
In fact, the biggest differences were in residential construction and retailing.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com