Sentence examples for differences of treatment from inspiring English sources

We anticipate to identify cost-utility differences of treatment choices for different groups of patients with CLBP and to suggest areas with a high potential for improved cost effectiveness.

The regulations also permit differences of treatment on grounds of sexual orientation where the employment is for the purposes of an organised religion.

The 14th Amendment is not to be canstrued 'as introducing a factitious equality without regard to practical differences that are best met by corresponding differences of treatment.' Standard Oil Co. v. Tennessee, 217 U. S. 413, 420, 54 L. ed.

Benedict's discretion is manifested in his repeated allowances for differences of treatment according to age, capabilities, dispositions, needs, and spiritual stature; beyond this is the striking humanity of his frank allowance for weaknesses and failure, of his compassion for the physically weak, and of his mingling of spiritual with purely practical counsel.

This may be related with the differences of treatment outcomes.

For dose-ranging ALN and CatK inhibitor L-833905 studies, DFBMD differences of treatment groups compared to vehicle were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Student-Neuman-Keuls post hoc testing.

Data analyzed by Student's t test at p ≤ 0.05 to calculate significant differences of treatments from the control (T10).

Slight difference of treatment schemes existed in the therapy schedules and the different duration of follow-up period among the included studies may be responsible for them.

In response, Mr. de la Sablière said, "It's probably fair to say that the difference of treatment came from the perception" of a gap between the UTA victims' awards and "what they were giving in this Lockerbie case".

"The directive contains a strict test which must be satisfied if a difference of treatment is to be considered non-discriminatory: there must be a genuine and determining occupational requirement, the objective must be legitimate and the requirement proportionate.

Indeed, as the three dissenters point out, there is a legal tension between saying that particular serious justifications are needed for such difference of treatment and then paradoxically not assessing whether such reasons where present, but rather going into the margin of appreciation question.