Sentence examples for differences of methodology from inspiring English sources

Papers were excluded if they: were economic evaluations of HIV/AIDS due to the differences of methodology across studies; were review articles; did not calculate the costs for any of the countries of interest for this study; did not contribute information of interest; were published before 1996, when HAART were introduced, dut to the impact on treatment costs they had.

Such contradictory findings may be attributed to differences of methodology and schizophrenia heterogeneity.

These discrepancies may depend on differences of methodology or antibodies used in each experiment, or may be because of the specific carcinoma explored.

As discussed in the paper, differences of methodology and types of patients enrolled in each individual trial may account for the few differences reported among the biologics.

Another explanation, that is, the difference of methodology, may be outlined because these authors used the molecular approach, whereas we used the disc diffusion method.

The differences might be also partially due to the differences of the methodologies used for accessing SRH among different countries, such as the methods involved in eliciting a response, the questions phrased, and the methods used for interviewing.

In addition to differences in terms of methodology, there are also other factors which make a clear comparison between all the cited studies difficult.

We may partly explain such discrepancy due to the difference of the methodology in our study utilized shRNAs and siRNAs instead of dominant-negative forms of TSG101 and Alix.

Because an average of the effect sizes would not be appropriate, and there was no intrinsic difference in strength of methodology, we chose the data based on the CESD cut point of 22.

In our national study, we found persistent racial disparities across income categories, but this may be the result of differences in methodology in the estimation of race-based risks or in the demographic makeup of the different study areas.

Evidence on socioeconomic trends in CHD mortality is difficult to interpret because of differences in methodology and inconsistencies in definitions of areas and populations.