Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
Differences in the wear behavior are rationalized in terms of the coating hardness and structure.
Imaging and chemical analysis of the high-temperature wear tracks allowed for explaining the differences in the wear mechanisms.
In the case of PMPC-grafted CLPE, there were no significant differences in the wear rates of the 3 and 6 mm disks.
Similar(57)
Comparing results from eight stations, there was no significant difference in the wear factor between the two groups and findings were comparable with the wear factors reported in other studies [23, 27].
On the other hand, when 1000-gf ball was used for the wear test, the difference in the wear track between the pristine and N implanted specimens was smaller than 500-gf ball.
The difference in hardness between the veneering materials and the composite restoratives could explain the difference in the wear volume.
A difference in the wear of claw horn can probably be found between replacement heifers housed in litter pens with and without access to an alley with a concrete or slatted floor.
Since the volume of creep deformation was significantly greater than that of true wear, the differences in the volumetric wear among the three materials for the 3-mm thick disks as well as that between untreated CLPE and PMPC-grafted CLPE for the 6-mm thick disks (which exhibited large creep deformation) might not be significant.
The differences observed in the wear behavior are related to the character of the wear debris formed at the tribocontact regions which are characterized with micro-Raman spectroscopy.
As in Test 1, the wear rates were calculated using linear regression, and the level of statistical significance of differences in the mean wear rate among the four groups was calculated using Student's t test.
The differences in the mean wear rates between the two designs in either position, and between the two positions in either design were not statistically significant.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com