Sentence examples for differences in the sum of from inspiring English sources

differences in the sum of internal and external rotational range (TRROM), and a combination of rotational ROM and torsional difference ("GIRD-torsion").

To identify significant differences in the sum of all significantly up- and down-regulated transcripts between treatments, significantly changed transcripts in one or more treatment, identified by the DESeq analysis, were transformed into a matrix with 1 = significantly up-regulated, −1 = significantly down-regulated and 0 = not significantly regulated transcript.

We did not observe substantial differences in the sum of parallel changes and reversals for RGC_CAs when the number of species varied between 14 and 19 (for 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, and 19 species the fraction of parallel changes and reversals were 0.08, 0.09, 0.08, 0.0.7, 0.10, and 0.08, respectively).

In the comparative locomotion- and hair coat questions, back radiology was a significant factor in explaining differences in the sum of scores: Patients with more radiological findings in the spine also had higher scores in the movement and coat related questions.

In addition, there were no differences in the sum of 37 PCBs (12 PCDD/F-like, 25 non-PCDD/F-like) in the aforementioned Danish-Finnish study in which placentas from mothers of 56 Finnish and 39 Danish cryptorchid and 56 Finnish and 129 Danish healthy children were analysed [ 30].

The feature value f j (x i ) of a Haar-like feature f j is defined as the difference in the sum of the pixel values of the white and block areas inside the rectangle in the detection window x i. Figure 1 Haar-like features in a detection window.

The traditional Adaboost face detection system employs an integral image that uses 3 × N × N operations in the detection window of size N × N to calculate the difference in the sum of the pixel values between the white and block areas inside the rectangular feature, as described in Section 2.

The significance of the difference in the sum of the site-wise log likelihoods of the two trees (unconstrained versus constrained) was then assessed using the SH test.

For further analyses, we calculated the difference in the sum of marked tile area within male pairs (hereafter " difference in the two males' scent marking").

The difference in the sum of variance component estimates can be used as an estimate of the phenotypic variance accounted for by the associated SNP.

There was a statistically significant difference in the sum of inflammatory cells between the three test periods for the control group (P value < 0.05).