Because the size of the SP-A agglutinates varied between individuals and it is known that SP-A is present in different oligomeric forms, we assumed that differences in the structural complexity may be responsible for the variation observed.
It is worth to notice that these broad peaks have maxima at different values of 2θ, which suggests differences in the structural arrangements of cationomers nos. 2 and 4. Adding to broad peaks in Fig. 5, one sharp peak is visible for both samples close to 2θ equal to about 30°.
The paramagnetism of the clay, where relevant, strongly influences the relaxation times measured, whereas in the other cases the different relaxation times allow one to discern differences in the structural organization and mobility of the organic macromolecules dependinding on the complex preparation.
We recently demonstrated robust age differences in the structural complexity of cortical [21] and subcortical structures [24].
They identified 24 genetic variations within six different genes, all of which were linked to differences in the structural integrity of major brain pathways.
Nevertheless, the subtle differences in the structural changes observed for the two different samples suggest that the electric-field-induced structural changes in ferroelectric single crystals are highly sensitive to the existent local imperfections and their evolution under applied electric fields.
In addition to the fact that there are differences in the structural, personnel, and apparative requirements for different levels of treatment, all of these trauma centers have well-educated trauma teams and standardized equipped resuscitation rooms for the early treatment phase of trauma patients.
Comparison of these ensembles and the ensemble of structures previously generated for αS reveals specific differences in the structural preferences of the three proteins and allows the effects of the hydrophobic core on the structural properties of these forms of synuclein, including their different aggregation propensities, to be examined at a molecular level.
However, differences in the structural disorder of porous carbon models have little impact on CO2 selectivity.
Results are discussed as a function of the differences in the structural properties.
