Sentence examples for differences in the significance from inspiring English sources

As in a preceding paper (Schnell et al. 2012), we observed differences in the significance levels when comparing the reduction of SR101 intensity, which was significant for all T4 concentrations tested, with the apparent numbers of SR101-labeled EGFP-positive astrocytes.

There were no differences in the significance levels of the existing variables in the models, which confirmed their significant association with false negatives as shown in the main analysis.

The models for average adjusted retention time of sucrose caprate and sucrose laurate showed only a few differences in the significance levels of terms, while the models for RDm showed larger differences between the sucrose alkanoates, in both the number of terms and their significance.

Generally, results were identical to two decimal places and there were no real differences in the significance of the variables in the final models (results not shown).

Graphs identifying the overall differences in the significance of P-values (chromatin state changes) were generated by computing the -log10 value of the sum of the P-values.

Additionally, univariate analyses were adjusted for gender, and these analyses are only referred to when major differences in the significance level were observed.

Furthermore, there is no difference in the significance of the correlation of distance calculated with a linear or exponential model assumed for the friction grid.

Most importantly, using IPA, for over-expressed genes we observed a very pronounced difference in the significance level of "NRF2-mediated oxidative stress pathway" between SNC and SC (Figure 2A).

There is likely a substantial difference in the significance of hsCRP elevation in predialysis and dialysis patients.

The difference in the significance of these two measures suggests that empirical results in the literature on condom use are sensitive to the precise definition of the variables.

However, the difference in the significance between the results of the two groups may be explained by the particularity in the cognitive, emotional, functional, and behavioral characteristics of each age group [ 24].