Significant differences in the species richness, spore abundance, root colonization, total glomalin, diversity index, and dominance index were observed between the EXO and NAT soils.
Significant differences in the species richness and diversity were found on the aquatic vegetation, with both increasing at the treatment site after the fertilization.
We found no significant differences in the species richness or abundance of saproxylic beetles between the control and sterilised wood and the fungal substrates.
We found no significant differences in the species richness and community composition of these organism groups between the protected and managed streams.
Similarly, differences in the species richness of ants (number of species per sample) between burned and unburned sites were negligible during the second year after fire (Fig. 1i).
Therefore, to examine whether treatment differences in the species richness of secondary colonizers were driven by differences in the abundance of secondary colonizers, we constructed rarefaction curves for each treatment.
The Kruskal Wallis rank sum test was used to test for differences in the observed richness and Shannon diversity between groups of samples.
This 75‐fold quantum‐yield reduction in S fBP can be rationalized by differences in the electron richness of the phosphate group (σp=0.0) and the phenoxide group (σp=−0.81) upon a specific chemical transformation of S fBP by DUSP3 (see Figure S2).
These sampling effort differences may have accounted for the differences in species richness between the SOND cruise and the present study.
Figures 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 show the lower-rank taxonomic groups of dominant phyla displayed in Figure 4 that predominantly account for the differences in genotype richness between the non-sulfidic and the sulfidic water samples.
