The central question is whether differences in sample preparation generated distinct MAVS filaments with different physical structures, or whether the differences in the reported structures instead reflect methodological problems in the Xu et al study.
For example, the item-fit residuals were statistically significant for several items, but the removal of some of these items led to negligible differences in the reported outcomes such as subgroup means and percentages at different proficiency levels.
All of these distinctions can lead to big differences in the reported overall P/E ratio of the stock market.
We believe that the differences in the reported data might be attributed to the differences in the experimental conditions.
There are, however, substantial differences in the reported kinetics and presumed mechanisms of decomposition, which are primarily related to the reactor design thus, reflecting the complexity of chemical reactions involved.
Comparison of the obtained in vitro release profiles to published in vivo data did not result in a distinct superiority of any of the tested methods regarding the predictability for the situation in vivo due to large differences in the reported in vivo data.
Differences in the reported urgency level of the crisis and disagreements and contradictions between the contents of international and domestic (Japanese) media after the earthquake soon emerged, with foreign media more sensational and focused almost exclusively on the nuclear crisis, rather than relief and recovery efforts (Sanchanta 2011).
There were minimal differences in the reported physical characteristics of catheters by the manufacturers (Table 4).
However, we found no differences in the reported use of stimulants or psychedelics before sex.
The differences in the reported mean score for three of the four scales were marginal and not statistically significant.
These observations could provide an explanation for some of the differences in the reported functional effects of PLCζ expression.
