Sentence examples for differences in the recruitment from inspiring English sources

Furthermore, no significant differences in the recruitment threshold were observed for all motor units analysed (P = .108).108

Therefore, we further examined if the fibrotic differences between WT and Ninj1 KO mice may have been resulted from differences in the recruitment of inflammatory cells.

Nonaka et al.16 showed seeding and aggregation of TDP-43 in SH5Y5 cells transiently transfected with WT or NLS mutant TDP-4316, although differences in the recruitment of these exogenously expressed proteins was not described.

Differences in the size-structure between the eastern and western islands suggest differences in the recruitment periodicity at both groups of islands, which could be related to large-scale spatial variation in the oceanographic conditions across an east west gradient along the Canary Islands.

While confirming the earlier observation that mutant CXCR4 can associate with β-Arrestin 2, the current biochemical data uncovered kinetic differences in the recruitment of β-Arrestin 2 by the WT and WHIM mutant CXCR4.

Next we investigated whether differences in AVP expression originate from differences in the sequence of HAB and LAB alleles that could underpin differences in the recruitment of proteins driving transcription.

It may be speculated that the difference in the recruitment of co-activators might influence the effectiveness of each ligand.

Thus, this difference in the recruitment strategy of our study might imply an underestimation of intervention effects.

When SQSTM1 and MAP1LC3B puncta were analyzed from 3 replicate experiments (Fig. 5G), there was no observable difference in the recruitment of MAP1LC3B to SQSTM1 puncta in cells expressing NSP6 compared with cells starved by transfer to HBSS.

Although there is a slight difference in the recruitment process for the trial at the two sites, the integrity of the randomisation process is safeguarded by the fact that there is equipoise in the decision process for women regarding which model of care they will receive.

There was no difference in the recruitment of patients between each randomisation group (45% medical practice vs. 48% researcher, (95% CI -5 to 11%) p = 0.508), however non-responders were younger than responders (mean age = 59.2 v 63.4 years, p = 0.011) but response was not related to gender.