Sentence examples for differences in the recognition from inspiring English sources

The slight differences observed in the frequency of nt in the putative U1 binding site between the S. purpuratus donor sites and the vertebrate donor splice sites, as well as the differences in the non-adjacent dependencies between the sequences from the different phyla imply differences in the recognition specificity of the spliceosome proteins.

Nevertheless, despite being in different clusters, the existing differences in the recognition sites allowed the ITS-RFLP markers to distinguish the two species.

To date, eight TRX-encoding genes have been found in Pisum sativum, and four belong to the TRXh type [21], [23], [24]; furthermore, PsTRXh1 and PsTRXh2 (Pisum sativum thioredoxin h2) show different protein-binding properties [25], and little is known about the differences in the recognition of their substrates.

Locked in by culture, language and a host of soft barriers like differences in the recognition of professional licensing, trouble transferring pension rights, access to public housing and varying tax codes, few Europeans are actually working outside their own countries in Europe.

No differences in the recognition of basic emotions were detected.

However, there are differences in the recognition of the adenine ring of NADPH in the two enzymes.

Similarly, this difference in the recognition rates could be related to a masking effect, produced by the Gaussian noise present in the auditory stimuli, which is more noticeable for the perception of the voiceless consonant /t/ than for the voiced consonant /d/. Figure 13 Pooled syllable confusion matrices, averaged across vowels, participants, and noise levels.

Also, it may imply a difference in the recognition mechanism for allosteric ligands between enzymes or in the structures of the substrate-binding and catalytic sites of enzymes.

Firstly, they show that, as expected, there was no difference in the recognition accuracy for the two landmark types at the start of the learning period.

The neisserial PorA protein and the neisserial C-terminal β-strands used by Robert et al. contained His at the +3 position, which is common for many OMP.16 proteins from β-proteobacteria and is not found in Escherichia OMPs; this might be the true difference in the recognition of C-terminal β-strands by the Escherichia BAM complex.

For example, a simple and popular channel normalization method, CMN, removes both the transmission characteristics and speaker characteristics, leading to differences in the speaker recognition and speech recognition performance.