Sentence examples for differences in the protection from inspiring English sources

So for the selection of relevant organisms, identification of regional differences in the protection status of particular species may be useful.

Active principles were subjected to photodegradation as pure molecules (mostly dissolved in water), and as solid pharmaceutical forms; in the last case, they were exposed inside the marketind pack as well as inside and outside the immediate pack, in order to evaluate eventual differences in the protection ability.

There may be biophysical and biochemical differences in the protection against ethanol-induced ROS or the reduction of ethanol-induced ROS generation between ND2-237Leu ND2-237Met7Met.

These levels of protection were better than those documented for BCG-Pasteur re-vaccinated African buffaloes (Syncerus caffer), in which revaccination gave not differences in the protection for vaccinated animals compared to unvaccinated animals [ 4].

In addition, there were no statistically significant differences in the protection efficacy or immune responses between groups A and B, which suggests that oral tolerance may not be induced by boost inoculation with the LTB adjuvant strain.

The analysis of the deuteration status of c- and z-ion fragment series thus allowed us to localize the residues that exhibited major differences in the protection between free Spy and Spy that is occupied by its client protein Im7.

The administration of 5,000 IU/kg of EPO as late as 6 hours after a 30-min ischemic insult protects the kidney from dysfunction and injury, with no significant difference in the protection seen when EPO is administered on reperfusion [47].

The administration of 5,000 IU/kg of EPO as late as 6 hours after a 30-min ischemic insult protects the kidney from dysfunction and injury, with no significant difference in the protection seen when EPO is administered on reperfusion [ 47].

The variations at nucleotide and amino acid in the structural genes can result in difference in the protection offered by these proteins when used as vaccines.

A difference in the protection effect was noted in the catches from the current study in comparison with experimental catches conducted in the same month in 1998 1999.

Given that the difference in the protection ratios can be up to 73 dB, as indicated in Table 2, the radius should be 10 to 15 times smaller, and it was set to 1.5 km. Figure 4 Definition of co-, andacent, and unaffected pixels.