Exact(1)
However, we were not able to evaluate the significance of the exposure time frame in this study because of the small differences in the monitoring times.
Similar(59)
There was no significant difference in the monitoring performance i.e. the latency and the number of incongruence detections between groups.
The most prominent differences in the parameters monitored for this trial were related to YR, HR, VMM, mortality rates, and malformation prevalence and type.
The most prominent differences in the parameters monitored for this trial were related to albumen-weight to egg-weight ratio (AR), yolk-weight to egg-weight ratio (YR), embryo-weight to egg-weight ratio (ER), heart rate (HR), voluntary movements per minute (VMM), mortality rates (MR), and malformation prevalence and type.
However, such international comparisons have limited health inferential value, not only because of the differences in PAH profiles, monitoring methodologies, monitoring durations, laboratory techniques, and instrument measurement errors, but also because of uncertainties in personal behavior choices and time spent in various microenvironmental settings.
We found a significant difference in producer detection rates between study sites, likely due to differences in the intensity of monitoring cattle between sites.
Based on recent modelling work [3], we hypothesised that this could be due to difference in standards of administering treatment at the centres, differences in the frequency of monitoring patients or variation in the profile of patients entering care (age and CD4 cell count when first presenting).
While the general medical management was quite similar in the majority of centres, there were sometimes important differences in the amount of monitoring and tests ordered (for instance, blood tests, cultures or PCR).
However, some respondents noted that there were important differences in the treatment and monitoring of HIV and TB: I'm not convinced that TB treatment and antiretroviral (ARV) treatment should be seen in exactly the same way.
The significant interaction was driven by greater activity during location recollection judgments for performed than for imagined actions, t(14) = 3.13, p <.01, but no difference in the reality monitoring of action memories, t(14) = 1.15, p =.27 (Fig. 4b).
These differences in effect estimates may be related to differences in the location of the monitoring stations and differences in the actual ambient levels of exposure of the population.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com