Low levels of micro-injected PI3Kα may therefore result very small differences in the low levels of PM-associated Alexa488 GST Grp1PH between cells injected with wild-type and mutant PI3Kα.
Here we show that the large effect of skipped words on the distribution of within-word fixation positions is primarily based on rather subtle differences in the low-level visual information acquired before saccades.
These differential ERPs cannot be accounted by the differences in the low-level features in the stimuli, because the identity of the faces and, therefore, several low-level features in the faces, varied from trial to trial.
The difference in median values between the low level FK778 and MMF groups was minimal.
Males used in these experiments were treated identically and showed no systematic differences in the two experiments, so the low level of two-fold differential expression in the male-juvenile female comparisons must reflect a higher level of transcript present in juvenile vs. mature females.
The difference in phenotypes is consistent with the low levels of Taz expression in optic vesicle cells.
Although, there is no precise limit values for differences between CG contents in individual genes, the low level of variations of the GC contents between tspO and the neighboring genes in each individual species or strains [29] suggests that tspO does not results from a recent gene transfer.
The o2o7 double mutant exhibits differences in expression patterns resembling those obtained for the o2 genotype, which, considering the low level of difference in expression level shown for the o7 genotype, is not unexpected.
Thus, holding the individual's Educational Attainment constant (at the lowest level), differences in Parental Education are still strongly associated with differences in the probability that the individual falls in the lower levels of the Literacy distribution.
Because the detection limit of the PCR assay we used, we cannot exclude the possibility of differences in very low level viraemia (i.e. <10 copies/ml) between groups, but if there was any, that does not appeared to have any impact on systemic inflammation.
One-way analysis of variance on exercise scores with prior knowledge as a covariate showed a significant difference between conditions in the low-level group: F 2,30) = 8.762, MSE = 3.419, P = 0.006 < 0.05, but not in the high-level group, F 2,37) = 3.416, MSE = 1.118, P = 0.073 > 0.05.
