Sentence examples for differences in the instruments from inspiring English sources
These results are similar despite differences in the instruments used to evaluate QOL and frailty.
The non-existence of ME/I can imply differences in the instrument's functioning in the populations studied and not necessarily reflect differences in the model of AL (Sirigatti et al. 2013).
Samples that were directly compared were done on the same day to minimize differences in the instrument settings.
Nevertheless, construct validity provided evidence of the degree to which participants' scores on the questionnaire were consistent with hypotheses formulated about the relationship of DICCQ with the participants' scores on other instruments measuring similar or dissimilar constructs, or differences in the instrument scores between subgroups of study participants.
This is an unusual finding that can't be fully explained by the difference in the instruments (classical versus traditional), playing method or intensity of the exercise.
Both instruments are strongly correlated with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.88 [ 45], so the difference in the instruments is assumed to have no impact on the relative treatment effect.
The apparent difference in the percentage values between FACS Calibur and Guava is thought to be caused by the difference in the instruments, and the difference in the percentage values in positive individuals between BM-ca and rituximab is thought to be derived from the difference in the quality of FITC-labeled antibodies.
The reason for this discrepancy is not clear, but may reflect underlying differences in the detection instruments.
Small sample size and differences in the assessment instruments used make this data difficult to interpret[ 9, 10].
Similar results were found in two other studies that assessed a sample of victims who requested medical assistance in various Madrid hospitals on the day of the terrorist attacks, despite differences in the assessment instruments and the methodology between them.
Differences between the studies may be due to differences in pesticide practices in the two regions, greater statistical power in the Long Island study, or differences in the survey instruments.
