Sentence examples for differences in the homing from inspiring English sources

The disparity between these in vitro and in vivo findings could then reflect differences in the homing potential of the three tested MSCs types, as implied by differential expression of integrin-α4 and the inability of integrin-α4-negative BM-MSCs to traffic to the CNS [ 70].

This study was designed to accentuate any radiation dose or fractionation induced differences in the homing of lineage negative, Kit positive donor BM cells between groups by using a higher total dose in the single fraction arms (13.6 Gy versus 12 Gy) and by limiting lung dose to 3% (compared to 50% in the clinical setting) in the lung shielding groups.

There was no significant difference in the homing between Pronase and trypsin treated cells.

This is most likely an over-simplifying hypothesis but at least provides a working model for the differences in metastatic homing by the cells with and without ADAMTS methylation.

The reason for this difference may reflect difference in the kinetics, homing potential or immune cell subsets involved in the biological functions measured in the two tests.

The differences in the relative percentage of homing markers may not necessarily reflect a true qualitative difference in the overall lymphocyte trafficking related to the mode of viral encounter and may depend on the time of analysis, since the kinetic of viral replication was delayed in the macaque exposed intrarectally.

They found no difference in homing success or homing time between different directions close to the hive [24], [25], consistent with our results.

To test for differences in homing efficiency between the experimental group and the two control groups over the full course of releases, we compared the last (twelfth) flight of each generation in the experimental group with the equivalent flights (twelfth, twenty-fourth, thirty-sixth, forty-eighth and sixtieth) in the control groups (Fig. 2a).

In a flat, featureless experimental area, where the maximum homing distance was 5600 m, they found no difference between the homing rates in the four directions, probably due to the missing panoramic cues.

Therefore, individual differences in call structures are unlikely used in the homing behaviour of parents.

There was no significant difference in the straightness of the homing trajectory among treatments during the pelagic phase of homing (control = 0.89 ± 0.04; magnetic = 0.93 ± 0.04; anosmic = 0.87 ± 0.03; LR test: χ 2 = 2.22, df = 2, p = 0.33).