Sentence examples for differences in the genera from inspiring English sources
Exacerbation-related variability in PA-colonised and non-PA-colonised patients was similar, and did not show statistically significant differences in the genera that showed increases in their relative abundance over 20%% (p >0.05, Chi-squared test; Fig. 5b, c).
Differences among the genera in clusters VI also presented in three ham samples.
Males present a slightly larger differentiation with 6 traits showing significant differences between the genera in the MASS corrected data.
In a paper published in July, John Scannella and Jack Horner of Montana State University suggested that the differences between the genera Torosaurus and Triceratops represented distinct growth stages within a single genus.
As shown in Fig. 6, the abundance of Lactobacillus was significantly (p < 0.05) greater in group A than group B. However, differences in the abundances of other genera were not significant.
However, when evaluating differences in the relative abundance of genera associated with the KhoeSan and a population of healthy Americans, we identified several abundant taxa in the KhoeSan that were at very low abundance or undetected among the Americans.
Other differences in the bacteriome include bacteria from the genera Pantoea, Sphingobacterium and Bacillus in the Cairns mosquitoes, and bacteria from the genera Klebsiella and Aeromonas in the Bangkok mosquitoes (Fig. 2b).
In comparison, the genera exhibit differences in the overall performance of corresponding probes.
Our primary goal is to apply statistical frameworks using formal hypothesis tests to answer the following questions: 1) Can we detect significant differences in the strength of selection between genera?
The differences in genera relative abundances between pyrene treatments and control were obviously not high enough to be detected in the samples, which again suggest that pyrene degraders were relatively rare.
We performed cladistic association analysis to test for differences in the frequency of particular phyla and genera between subject groups (Figure 4a and Tables 3 and 5).
